<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Essence of Knowledge Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/</link>
	<description>A blog about Knowledge Management, Communities, Collaboration, Learning, Social Computing and Work/Life Balance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: elsua: The Knowledge Management Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-14265</link>
		<dc:creator>elsua: The Knowledge Management Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/#comment-14265</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web 2.0 in Search of Better Definition or Just Moving On...&lt;/strong&gt;

Are you still stuck with defining what Web 2.0 is all about? Wouldn&#039;t it be better if we would stop that and move on ? Could we live without a definition for Web 2.0 that will rule them all ? May yes, but may be not. Here is why it would not work out ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web 2.0 in Search of Better Definition or Just Moving On&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Are you still stuck with defining what Web 2.0 is all about? Wouldn&#8217;t it be better if we would stop that and move on ? Could we live without a definition for Web 2.0 that will rule them all ? May yes, but may be not. Here is why it would not work out &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Interaction Glossary by Nancy White</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-11294</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Interaction Glossary by Nancy White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/#comment-11294</guid>
		<description>[...] What a fantastic resource that is ! In Updating My Online Interaction Glossary Nancy has put together a must-read glossary of terms that she has been exposed over time in her daily online interactions with other folks. Indeed, a must-go-through resource specially if you are about to enter the world of online, remote collaboration and if in particular you would want to catch up with some of the hot terms as far as social software, knowledge sharing and collaboration is concerned. That is why you would be able to read in very brief notes on terms like Aggregation, Weblog, Blogroll, Communities of Practice, Feeds, Folksonomy, Knowledge Management (Where I would probably need to add, yet again, another definition to The Essence of Knowledge Management weblog post I created not long ago), Mashup, Permalink, Presence Indicators, RSS, Social Software, Tagging, Virtual Community, Web 2.0, Wiki, etc. etc. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What a fantastic resource that is ! In Updating My Online Interaction Glossary Nancy has put together a must-read glossary of terms that she has been exposed over time in her daily online interactions with other folks. Indeed, a must-go-through resource specially if you are about to enter the world of online, remote collaboration and if in particular you would want to catch up with some of the hot terms as far as social software, knowledge sharing and collaboration is concerned. That is why you would be able to read in very brief notes on terms like Aggregation, Weblog, Blogroll, Communities of Practice, Feeds, Folksonomy, Knowledge Management (Where I would probably need to add, yet again, another definition to The Essence of Knowledge Management weblog post I created not long ago), Mashup, Permalink, Presence Indicators, RSS, Social Software, Tagging, Virtual Community, Web 2.0, Wiki, etc. etc. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elsua: The Knowledge Management Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-6429</link>
		<dc:creator>elsua: The Knowledge Management Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/#comment-6429</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sanity Amidst KM Chaos?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I am not sure if you folks have already seen this or not, but just in case you may not have, here it goes. Last week Dr. Dan Kirsch (From KMPro) just got started with his own Knowledge Management weblog......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sanity Amidst KM Chaos?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I am not sure if you folks have already seen this or not, but just in case you may not have, here it goes. Last week Dr. Dan Kirsch (From KMPro) just got started with his own Knowledge Management weblog&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stop Apologising for Knowledge Management</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stop Apologising for Knowledge Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/05/31/the-essence-of-knowledge-management/#comment-5326</guid>
		<description>[...] I agree with David that Knowledge Management is just a label, like KM is, like many many others. That is one of the things that differentiates as human beings, the fact that we need to label everything, but that is it. There is no need to go beyond that. What really matters is to actually make use of that label to move into the next level which is basically explaining what KM is all about, bring in some sensemaking into it, even though that may not necessarily be an easy thing either, as I have commented elsewhere as well. But at least, we should try ! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I agree with David that Knowledge Management is just a label, like KM is, like many many others. That is one of the things that differentiates as human beings, the fact that we need to label everything, but that is it. There is no need to go beyond that. What really matters is to actually make use of that label to move into the next level which is basically explaining what KM is all about, bring in some sensemaking into it, even though that may not necessarily be an easy thing either, as I have commented elsewhere as well. But at least, we should try ! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
