<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Management Knowledgement (MK) &#8211; When Are We Going to Learn?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/</link>
	<description>A blog about Knowledge Management, Communities, Collaboration, Learning, Social Computing and Work/Life Balance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Internal communication blogs and km2.0 :: May :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Internal communication blogs and km2.0 :: May :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 15:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>[...] KM2.0 Enterprise 2.0 Reinventing the intranet Enterprise2.0 Is the Enterprise Web 2.0-ready?  Enterprise 2.0 Would Signal The End Of The Corporate KM Function Is Web 2.0 enterprise-ready? Why Web 2.0 Matters to your Business - Knowledge Discovery The Trends Underlying Enterprise 2.0 Management Knowledgement (MK) - When Are We Going to Learn? Modern Social Software Could Be the Key to Building Effective Enterprise Knowledge Systems - Reinventing the Intranet Harvesting Implicit Knowledge - Preparing the Way for Enterprise 2.0 Is Web 2.0 enterprise-ready? Why Web 2.0 Matters to your Business - Knowledge Sharing Itâ€™s Time to Take the Quotation Marks Off â€œWeb 2.0â€³ Bringing Web 2.0 to the Intranet Wikis, blogs and other community tools in the enterprise Social Networking Comes to the Enterprise Web 2.0 meets the enterprise Is Social Software Necessary &amp; Sufficient For KM? Personal Knowledge Management Tools Ready For Enterprise Use Enterprise 2.0 - What&#8217;s the PU? Enterprise 2.0 discussion continues [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] KM2.0 Enterprise 2.0 Reinventing the intranet Enterprise2.0 Is the Enterprise Web 2.0-ready?  Enterprise 2.0 Would Signal The End Of The Corporate KM Function Is Web 2.0 enterprise-ready? Why Web 2.0 Matters to your Business &#8211; Knowledge Discovery The Trends Underlying Enterprise 2.0 Management Knowledgement (MK) &#8211; When Are We Going to Learn? Modern Social Software Could Be the Key to Building Effective Enterprise Knowledge Systems &#8211; Reinventing the Intranet Harvesting Implicit Knowledge &#8211; Preparing the Way for Enterprise 2.0 Is Web 2.0 enterprise-ready? Why Web 2.0 Matters to your Business &#8211; Knowledge Sharing Itâ€™s Time to Take the Quotation Marks Off â€œWeb 2.0â€³ Bringing Web 2.0 to the Intranet Wikis, blogs and other community tools in the enterprise Social Networking Comes to the Enterprise Web 2.0 meets the enterprise Is Social Software Necessary &#38; Sufficient For KM? Personal Knowledge Management Tools Ready For Enterprise Use Enterprise 2.0 &#8211; What&#8217;s the PU? Enterprise 2.0 discussion continues [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikis, Blogs and Other Points of Failure - Fear Not</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikis, Blogs and Other Points of Failure - Fear Not</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>[...] Talking about the new style on Knowledge Management, I thought that people would be interested in reading this particular news article: Wikis, Blogs and Other Points of Failure by Joshua Greenbaum on how both wikis and weblogs may not be the best of knowledge sharing and collaborative tools in the enterprise for some of the problems he identifies as lack of subject matters checking further and validating on the sources of information. I must say that after reading the article I just couldn&#8217;t help smiling about where the controversy or that failure comes from. According to Joshua:  &#8220;[&#8230;] self-publishing â€” which is really what wikis and blogs are all about â€” is extremely hazardous to corporate health. Some of these hazards are well recognized: Employee blogs are infamous for publicizing corporate secrets and intellectual property.&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Talking about the new style on Knowledge Management, I thought that people would be interested in reading this particular news article: Wikis, Blogs and Other Points of Failure by Joshua Greenbaum on how both wikis and weblogs may not be the best of knowledge sharing and collaborative tools in the enterprise for some of the problems he identifies as lack of subject matters checking further and validating on the sources of information. I must say that after reading the article I just couldn&#8217;t help smiling about where the controversy or that failure comes from. According to Joshua:  &#8220;[&#8230;] self-publishing â€” which is really what wikis and blogs are all about â€” is extremely hazardous to corporate health. Some of these hazards are well recognized: Employee blogs are infamous for publicizing corporate secrets and intellectual property.&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Jack, for the feedback comments and for the trackback ! Indeed, I am just not saying that the old style of KM, as you well put it, was / is the perfect KM system. In fact, we all know it wasn&#039;t. What I am saying is that the new style of KM is not going to work per se either. It will fail in exactly the same terms as the old style. Not trying to reach for a balance between tacit and explicit knowledge is not going to help any KM system out there. All the other way around. It is going to get into trouble.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;&lt;em&gt;I frequently talk about personal vs corporate knowledge management to help create a conversation around the needs of the corporation and the individuals being asked to &quot;do&quot; knowledge management&lt;/em&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I actually quite enjoyed reading that quote since that is exactly what I have been advocating for all along: &lt;em&gt;a balance between personal (Tacit) and corporate (Explicit) knowledge management&lt;/em&gt; as the key to a successful KM strategy. And that balance would be just the key word you have just mentioned above: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;a conversation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. Something that hasn&#039;t happen in the past and which I think would be key. And when thinking about conversations I think we all know where it will all be heading, right ? ... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/04/what-is-happening-with-km-the-shift-to-social-computing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Exactly&lt;/a&gt; !
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks again for the feedback input!
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jack, for the feedback comments and for the trackback ! Indeed, I am just not saying that the old style of KM, as you well put it, was / is the perfect KM system. In fact, we all know it wasn&#8217;t. What I am saying is that the new style of KM is not going to work per se either. It will fail in exactly the same terms as the old style. Not trying to reach for a balance between tacit and explicit knowledge is not going to help any KM system out there. All the other way around. It is going to get into trouble.
</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<em>I frequently talk about personal vs corporate knowledge management to help create a conversation around the needs of the corporation and the individuals being asked to &#8220;do&#8221; knowledge management</em>&#8220;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I actually quite enjoyed reading that quote since that is exactly what I have been advocating for all along: <em>a balance between personal (Tacit) and corporate (Explicit) knowledge management</em> as the key to a successful KM strategy. And that balance would be just the key word you have just mentioned above: <em><strong>a conversation</strong></em>. Something that hasn&#8217;t happen in the past and which I think would be key. And when thinking about conversations I think we all know where it will all be heading, right ? &#8230; <a href="http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/04/what-is-happening-with-km-the-shift-to-social-computing/" rel="nofollow">Exactly</a> !
</p>
<p>Thanks again for the feedback input!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knowledge Jolt with Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowledge Jolt with Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 04:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/04/11/management-knowledgement-mk-when-are-we-going-to-learn/#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Manage Knowledgement...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ross Mayfield uses a new term for knowledge management to reflect his focus on the social side of knowledge, &quot;Manage Knowledgement.&quot;
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Manage Knowledgement&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ross Mayfield uses a new term for knowledge management to reflect his focus on the social side of knowledge, &#8220;Manage Knowledgement.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
