<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Performancing For FireFox, Qumana and Flock Ever Work with Roller Weblogger?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/</link>
	<description>A blog about Knowledge Management, Communities, Collaboration, Learning, Social Computing and Work/Life Balance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:23:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Upgrading Performancing For FireFox 1.1: Roller Integration and a Few Other Things</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Upgrading Performancing For FireFox 1.1: Roller Integration and a Few Other Things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier on today I got the headsup from Jed (Thanks a lot for the feedback comments, by the way ! Good stuff !) indicating that the upgraded version of Performancing for FireFox is readily available for those folks who may be brave enough to give it a try. Of course, I had to give it a try, specially since I have been commenting a few times on a number of different items that I thought would be worth while having at the same time that I wanted to confirm if it would eventually be working with Roller Weblogger. And WOW! Let me tell you how my experience has been so far ! Yes, indeed, WOW! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier on today I got the headsup from Jed (Thanks a lot for the feedback comments, by the way ! Good stuff !) indicating that the upgraded version of Performancing for FireFox is readily available for those folks who may be brave enough to give it a try. Of course, I had to give it a try, specially since I have been commenting a few times on a number of different items that I thought would be worth while having at the same time that I wanted to confirm if it would eventually be working with Roller Weblogger. And WOW! Let me tell you how my experience has been so far ! Yes, indeed, WOW! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 05:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Luis,

1.1 is out!! :D I&#039;ve been working with Dave, from Roller and he helped guide me while fixing support for roller.

1.1 should work with the latest roller version, including accounts at jroller. However for category support I believe only the upcoming release of roller 2.1 get&#039;s it right with tha API (I could be wrong, maybe other versions of roller will work).

Anyhow, please give it a whirl and report back with any issues you are having, and as always I will try and get right on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis,</p>
<p>1.1 is out!! <img src='http://www.elsua.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;ve been working with Dave, from Roller and he helped guide me while fixing support for roller.</p>
<p>1.1 should work with the latest roller version, including accounts at jroller. However for category support I believe only the upcoming release of roller 2.1 get&#8217;s it right with tha API (I could be wrong, maybe other versions of roller will work).</p>
<p>Anyhow, please give it a whirl and report back with any issues you are having, and as always I will try and get right on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Hello CÃ©sar and thanks for the pingback ! Yes, indeed, I can&#039;t wait for Performancing For FireFox 1.1 to go live as I have been waiting for it to see if I could transition into it without having a second piece of software installed in my machine to weblog content into my weblog. Great thing of this new release is that if it works all right we may be able to prepare the way for when Roller will be added as another weblogging engine, which means that setting it up will be really a piece of cake, as has been detailed over here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://rollerweblogger.org/page/roller?entry=performancing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Performancing!&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We shall see how that goes but so far it looks like things are looking bright. Thanks to &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.jedbrown.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jed&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.raibledesigns.com/page/rd&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matt&lt;/a&gt; for their hard work and for their support. We, webloggers, will be very grateful to you both very shortly !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello CÃ©sar and thanks for the pingback ! Yes, indeed, I can&#8217;t wait for Performancing For FireFox 1.1 to go live as I have been waiting for it to see if I could transition into it without having a second piece of software installed in my machine to weblog content into my weblog. Great thing of this new release is that if it works all right we may be able to prepare the way for when Roller will be added as another weblogging engine, which means that setting it up will be really a piece of cake, as has been detailed over here: <a href="http://rollerweblogger.org/page/roller?entry=performancing" rel="nofollow">Performancing!</a>. </p>
<p>We shall see how that goes but so far it looks like things are looking bright. Thanks to <a href="http://blog.jedbrown.net/" rel="nofollow">Jed</a> and <a href="http://www.raibledesigns.com/page/rd" rel="nofollow">Matt</a> for their hard work and for their support. We, webloggers, will be very grateful to you both very shortly !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ktn - About to try Performancing for Firefox : January : 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Ktn - About to try Performancing for Firefox : January : 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to the several posts that Luis has been sharing in regards to Performancing for Firefox, looks like soon we will have a new release of Performancing for Firefox which will actually work with Roller. Yes! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to the several posts that Luis has been sharing in regards to Performancing for Firefox, looks like soon we will have a new release of Performancing for Firefox which will actually work with Roller. Yes! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Great, Jed ! Thanks again for dropping by and for sharing your thoughts. Indeed, I have read about it over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://rollerweblogger.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Roller&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s weblog that you guys are working together to make it work. That is just fantastic ! And I surely look forward to trying it out whenever it goes life. Hopefully, it will work just fine and we can certainly enjoy using a much nicer integration with that particular weblogging engine. Appreciated all the help, support and comments shared so far, Jed. Thanks ! 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For those folks interested in following up the conversation over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://rollerweblogger.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Roller&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s weblog here you have got the link with the information details: &lt;a href=&quot;http://rollerweblogger.org/page/roller?entry=performancing_1_1_release_coming#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Performancing 1.1 release coming soon&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, Jed ! Thanks again for dropping by and for sharing your thoughts. Indeed, I have read about it over at <a href="http://rollerweblogger.org" rel="nofollow">Roller</a>&#8217;s weblog that you guys are working together to make it work. That is just fantastic ! And I surely look forward to trying it out whenever it goes life. Hopefully, it will work just fine and we can certainly enjoy using a much nicer integration with that particular weblogging engine. Appreciated all the help, support and comments shared so far, Jed. Thanks ! </p>
<p>For those folks interested in following up the conversation over at <a href="http://rollerweblogger.org" rel="nofollow">Roller</a>&#8217;s weblog here you have got the link with the information details: <a href="http://rollerweblogger.org/page/roller?entry=performancing_1_1_release_coming#comments" rel="nofollow">Performancing 1.1 release coming soon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 06:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>No problem, thank you for pointing out the roller issue. 
Dave from rollerweblogger.org has been of great help explaining exactly what their API is doing, so 1.1 should be compatible.
Also, sorry for the spacing issue on my comments.. not sure what&#039;s going on there ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, thank you for pointing out the roller issue.<br />
Dave from rollerweblogger.org has been of great help explaining exactly what their API is doing, so 1.1 should be compatible.<br />
Also, sorry for the spacing issue on my comments.. not sure what&#8217;s going on there <img src='http://www.elsua.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Excellent stuff, Jed ! Thanks much for sharing with us what is actually happening with Performancing For FireFox. Indeed, just as I was posting this weblog entry I saw that you guys were working on an upcoming upgrade for PFF. I am glad to know you guys are fixing the MetaWeblog API issue and it will be my pleasure to take it for a spin this coming week and report on my findings as to how it went. I am glad to hear you guys are working actively towards fixing this issue and, hopefully, when the new release goes out we would be able to work with it the way it is supposed to. Thanks again for dropping by and for sharing this very valuable feedback ! No need to apologise. Just great stuff !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent stuff, Jed ! Thanks much for sharing with us what is actually happening with Performancing For FireFox. Indeed, just as I was posting this weblog entry I saw that you guys were working on an upcoming upgrade for PFF. I am glad to know you guys are fixing the MetaWeblog API issue and it will be my pleasure to take it for a spin this coming week and report on my findings as to how it went. I am glad to hear you guys are working actively towards fixing this issue and, hopefully, when the new release goes out we would be able to work with it the way it is supposed to. Thanks again for dropping by and for sharing this very valuable feedback ! No need to apologise. Just great stuff !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2006/01/20/will-performancing-for-firefox-qumana-and-flock-ever-work-with-roller-weblogger/#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Luis,

Thanks for bringing this up. While I have not actually tried out Roller, I can tell you that it is a PFF issue. In versions 1.0 and 1.0.1 the metaWeblog API is incorrect and does not work.

This has been fixed and will be available in 1.1 which should go out on Tuesday.

So sorry about that, it was an overlook on my part as I only recently (after 1.0.1 was released) found out there was an issue with this API.

Once again, I&#039;m sorry.

Anyhow, once 1.1 is out if you could get that a try that would be awesome. In the meantime I&#039;ll look into Roller and get a test account going for myself to try it on.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis,</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing this up. While I have not actually tried out Roller, I can tell you that it is a PFF issue. In versions 1.0 and 1.0.1 the metaWeblog API is incorrect and does not work.</p>
<p>This has been fixed and will be available in 1.1 which should go out on Tuesday.</p>
<p>So sorry about that, it was an overlook on my part as I only recently (after 1.0.1 was released) found out there was an issue with this API.</p>
<p>Once again, I&#8217;m sorry.</p>
<p>Anyhow, once 1.1 is out if you could get that a try that would be awesome. In the meantime I&#8217;ll look into Roller and get a test account going for myself to try it on.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
