<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weblogging Directly from FireFox &#8211; Performancing for FireFox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/</link>
	<description>A blog about Knowledge Management, Communities, Collaboration, Learning, Social Computing and Work/Life Balance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:49:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A ~ A KM Blog Thinking Outside The Inbox by Luis Suarez &#187; Research Survey on Weblogging about Work - FollowUp</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-975295</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A ~ A KM Blog Thinking Outside The Inbox by Luis Suarez &#187; Research Survey on Weblogging about Work - FollowUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-975295</guid>
		<description>[...] weblog may not have lots of very good examples on this but to give you a little bit of an idea here and here you have got a couple of instances where you can read some more on what I mean.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weblog may not have lots of very good examples on this but to give you a little bit of an idea here and here you have got a couple of instances where you can read some more on what I mean.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-126969</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-126969</guid>
		<description>Hi Emily! Thanks very much for dropping by and for the feedback comments. I have now taken a look into my blogroll from this weblog template and also from my BlogLines account, which is currently feeding the blogroll, and I have successfully updated the new URL address of your weblog. I guess that it should be all right by now, since I have checked all of the updates and they have all gone through. Do have a look and let me know if you would need anything else and thanks again for the heads up on the new weblog address from your own weblog. Keep up the great work ! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Emily! Thanks very much for dropping by and for the feedback comments. I have now taken a look into my blogroll from this weblog template and also from my BlogLines account, which is currently feeding the blogroll, and I have successfully updated the new URL address of your weblog. I guess that it should be all right by now, since I have checked all of the updates and they have all gone through. Do have a look and let me know if you would need anything else and thanks again for the heads up on the new weblog address from your own weblog. Keep up the great work ! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-126866</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-126866</guid>
		<description>Hi and thanks so much for linking to my blog on ‘How to Blog’!!

 

My site has moved, so  I am writing to ask if you could please update your link to reflect the new permanent URL?  

 

Whereas ‘How to Blog’ used to be located at http://blogging.typepad.com, it has moved permanently to:

http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/

 

Can you please change your link to How to Blog to reflect its current URL (http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/) 

 

Thanks so much in advance!!

 

Best regards,

Emily from How to Blog

 

How to Blog: Blogging tips, tricks, templates, tutorials, and more!

http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi and thanks so much for linking to my blog on ‘How to Blog’!!</p>
<p>My site has moved, so  I am writing to ask if you could please update your link to reflect the new permanent URL?  </p>
<p>Whereas ‘How to Blog’ used to be located at <a href="http://blogging.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://blogging.typepad.com</a>, it has moved permanently to:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/</a></p>
<p>Can you please change your link to How to Blog to reflect its current URL (<a href="http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog/</a>) </p>
<p>Thanks so much in advance!!</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Emily from How to Blog</p>
<p>How to Blog: Blogging tips, tricks, templates, tutorials, and more!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.emilyrobbins.com/how-to-blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne McDaniels</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne McDaniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 04:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-669</guid>
		<description>I am glad I came across your post. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad I came across your post. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Gayle, for dropping by and for sharing this feedback. I am glad to hear you have found this weblog post useful. I am sure that if you folks have given it a try you will enjoy it just as much as using any other weblogging tool, if not more. Glad to be able to help ! Appreciated the feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gayle, for dropping by and for sharing this feedback. I am glad to hear you have found this weblog post useful. I am sure that if you folks have given it a try you will enjoy it just as much as using any other weblogging tool, if not more. Glad to be able to help ! Appreciated the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle Surratt</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle Surratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information. My husband was looking for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information. My husband was looking for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will Performancing For FireFox, Qumana and Flock Ever Work with Roller Weblogger?</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will Performancing For FireFox, Qumana and Flock Ever Work with Roller Weblogger?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] Today was the day where I was back at work trying to weblog in my Intranet weblog and to take things for a spin I decided to see how the Performancing for FireFox extension from FireFox would work. If you would remember, not long ago, I created a couple of weblog posts on my overall experience about Performancing for FireFox and back then I mentioned how I saw some initial issues when trying to get this extension to work with one other Open Source weblogging engine, which is Roller Weblogger. And the same thing happened with Flock&#8217;s weblogging component. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today was the day where I was back at work trying to weblog in my Intranet weblog and to take things for a spin I decided to see how the Performancing for FireFox extension from FireFox would work. If you would remember, not long ago, I created a couple of weblog posts on my overall experience about Performancing for FireFox and back then I mentioned how I saw some initial issues when trying to get this extension to work with one other Open Source weblogging engine, which is Roller Weblogger. And the same thing happened with Flock&#8217;s weblogging component. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Ready to Flock</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Ready to Flock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>[...] In another weblog post Lloyd Budd asked me to created an updated weblog post since last time I talked a bit about the topic of Flock and I thought that this time around it would be a good time to share some thoughts on the latest build I have been trying the last couple of days. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In another weblog post Lloyd Budd asked me to created an updated weblog post since last time I talked a bit about the topic of Flock and I thought that this time around it would be a good time to share some thoughts on the latest build I have been trying the last couple of days. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Hello Brad and welcome to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsua.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;elsua&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ! Yes, indeed, I have noticed that, too. I guess that is what it takes to be a pretty popular web browser as opposed to some others not so popular. However, I am wondering how much longer we will have to put up with this given the &lt;a href=&quot;http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/rumor-google-to-buy-opera-according-to.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/dvorak-microsoft-should-buy-opera.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rumours&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/is-opera-looking-to-be-bought.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Opera being bought&lt;/a&gt; by whatever other major companies, although &lt;a href=&quot;http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/rumor-control-microsoft-not-buying.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;none of those rumours&lt;/a&gt; seem to &lt;a href=&quot;http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/opera-ceo-emphatically-denies.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;have anything in concrete&lt;/a&gt;. Maybe it will happen in the end, who knows. But even if it hasn&#039;t, given the fact that the browser is freeware at the moment, it may start opening things up in the end. We shall see.


I am sure that after the browser has been made available now for free that we will start seeing more developments in due course, probably during the course of 2006. I do hope, too, though that it may not be too late. Let&#039;s hope it isn&#039;t, because it would be too bad to have to move to other more innovative web browsers than just Opera, because so far, in my opinion, it has been leading the way and, hopefully, it will continue to be like that for many more months to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Brad and welcome to <a href="http://www.elsua.net" rel="nofollow"><i>elsua</i></a> ! Yes, indeed, I have noticed that, too. I guess that is what it takes to be a pretty popular web browser as opposed to some others not so popular. However, I am wondering how much longer we will have to put up with this given the <a href="http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/rumor-google-to-buy-opera-according-to.html" rel="nofollow">recent</a> <a href="http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/dvorak-microsoft-should-buy-opera.html" rel="nofollow">rumours</a> of <a href="http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/is-opera-looking-to-be-bought.html" rel="nofollow">Opera being bought</a> by whatever other major companies, although <a href="http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/rumor-control-microsoft-not-buying.html" rel="nofollow">none of those rumours</a> seem to <a href="http://operawatch.blogspot.com/2005/12/opera-ceo-emphatically-denies.html" rel="nofollow">have anything in concrete</a>. Maybe it will happen in the end, who knows. But even if it hasn&#8217;t, given the fact that the browser is freeware at the moment, it may start opening things up in the end. We shall see.</p>
<p>I am sure that after the browser has been made available now for free that we will start seeing more developments in due course, probably during the course of 2006. I do hope, too, though that it may not be too late. Let&#8217;s hope it isn&#8217;t, because it would be too bad to have to move to other more innovative web browsers than just Opera, because so far, in my opinion, it has been leading the way and, hopefully, it will continue to be like that for many more months to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/21/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I too prefer Opera to all the other browsers out there.  Sadly, we are seeing more and more add-ins being created exclusively for Firefox.  Seems every other day there is another tool or utility.

I believe Opera held on too tight to the code options so people couldn&#039;t readily go out and configure new plugins early on.  Now, there is an uphill battle in getting these working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too prefer Opera to all the other browsers out there.  Sadly, we are seeing more and more add-ins being created exclusively for Firefox.  Seems every other day there is another tool or utility.</p>
<p>I believe Opera held on too tight to the code options so people couldn&#8217;t readily go out and configure new plugins early on.  Now, there is an uphill battle in getting these working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
