<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qumana &#8211; Making Your Content Readily Available in Your Weblog Without Hardly Any Effort</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/</link>
	<description>A blog about Knowledge Management, Communities, Collaboration, Learning, Social Computing and Work/Life Balance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:56:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Upgrade to WordPress 2.0 Has Now Been Completed</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A ~ A KM Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Upgrade to WordPress 2.0 Has Now Been Completed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsr.blogsome.com/2005/08/15/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>[...] We shall see how things will go further but as far as I can see things are going quite all right at the moment. As we go along in time I may eventually continue sharing some more thoughts on the overall weblogging experience with the new upgrade to WordPress next to other existing options like w.bloggar, Qumana, Performancing for FireFox, or Flock&#8217;s weblogging component, which I have been weblogging about already. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We shall see how things will go further but as far as I can see things are going quite all right at the moment. As we go along in time I may eventually continue sharing some more thoughts on the overall weblogging experience with the new upgrade to WordPress next to other existing options like w.bloggar, Qumana, Performancing for FireFox, or Flock&#8217;s weblogging component, which I have been weblogging about already. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will Performancing For FireFox, Qumana and Flock Ever Work with Roller Weblogger?</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will Performancing For FireFox, Qumana and Flock Ever Work with Roller Weblogger?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsr.blogsome.com/2005/08/15/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>[...] Oh, but don&#8217;t worry, because this same issue is happening to other weblogging tools that I have been talking about over here: Both Qumana and the weblogging component from Flock have got this same problem and unless Roller is added into the list of options available for selection I doubt we would have any success to make full use of the capabilities of each of these weblogging tools for that particular weblogging engine. And that, to me, would be a pity, because although this engine may not be particularly popular like Blogger, TypePad or LiveJournal it is still an option out there for quite a few of us and therefore it would be just like shutting us down from the benefits of weblogging in general. That is why I just hope that one of these days this Open Source weblogging engine would be part of all three weblogging tool options. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oh, but don&#8217;t worry, because this same issue is happening to other weblogging tools that I have been talking about over here: Both Qumana and the weblogging component from Flock have got this same problem and unless Roller is added into the list of options available for selection I doubt we would have any success to make full use of the capabilities of each of these weblogging tools for that particular weblogging engine. And that, to me, would be a pity, because although this engine may not be particularly popular like Blogger, TypePad or LiveJournal it is still an option out there for quite a few of us and therefore it would be just like shutting us down from the benefits of weblogging in general. That is why I just hope that one of these days this Open Source weblogging engine would be part of all three weblogging tool options. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Ready to Flock - Part Deux</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Ready to Flock - Part Deux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsr.blogsome.com/2005/08/15/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week, if you would remember, I created a number of different weblog posts to touch base on a number of different weblogging tools available that I have been trying out lately apart from my two favourite ones so far, Qumana and w.bloggar. It all started with the new FireFox extension called Performancing for FireFox and then it went to discuss a bit more regarding the weblogging component from Flock. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week, if you would remember, I created a number of different weblog posts to touch base on a number of different weblogging tools available that I have been trying out lately apart from my two favourite ones so far, Qumana and w.bloggar. It all started with the new FireFox extension called Performancing for FireFox and then it went to discuss a bit more regarding the weblogging component from Flock. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Ready to Flock</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Ready to Flock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsr.blogsome.com/2005/08/15/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>[...] However, and just because there are so many things to talk about this web browser, and to not try to bore people to death with a lengthy weblog post, I am going to focus, for the time being, and on this particular post on the weblogging component from Flock, since I have already been sharing my thoughts about Qumana, w.bloggar and Performancing for FireFox. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, and just because there are so many things to talk about this web browser, and to not try to bore people to death with a lengthy weblog post, I am going to focus, for the time being, and on this particular post on the weblogging component from Flock, since I have already been sharing my thoughts about Qumana, w.bloggar and Performancing for FireFox. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weblogging Directly from FireFox - Performancing for FireFox - Part Deux</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weblogging Directly from FireFox - Performancing for FireFox - Part Deux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsr.blogsome.com/2005/08/15/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>[...] Ease of Use while posting the content into the weblog: Indeed, one of my favourite features is the fact that this extension includes the best of both worlds: an WYSIWYG editor, or Rich editing tab, from where I can type and see what it looks like on the fly and if I am not happy with it or if I would want to change some of the HTML tags used then I can go into the Source Editing tab where I can make any other modifications I may need and tailor them to make them look the way I want. Pretty neat, specially if you come to consider that other weblogging tools like Qumana or w.bloggar do not seem to provide that hybrid functionality. I wonder about other weblogging tools out there I may not have been exposed to yet&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ease of Use while posting the content into the weblog: Indeed, one of my favourite features is the fact that this extension includes the best of both worlds: an WYSIWYG editor, or Rich editing tab, from where I can type and see what it looks like on the fly and if I am not happy with it or if I would want to change some of the HTML tags used then I can go into the Source Editing tab where I can make any other modifications I may need and tailor them to make them look the way I want. Pretty neat, specially if you come to consider that other weblogging tools like Qumana or w.bloggar do not seem to provide that hybrid functionality. I wonder about other weblogging tools out there I may not have been exposed to yet&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weblogging Directly from FireFox - Performancing for FireFox</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>E L S U A . N E T &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weblogging Directly from FireFox - Performancing for FireFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsr.blogsome.com/2005/08/15/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>[...] But things do not just stop there. Several other weblogging tools, like, for instance, Qumana do have the possibility of using different APIs to connect to weblogging engines. So that is why although Roller may not be listed there I can still create an account using the MetaWeblog API, which seems to be working just fine. I can connect to my Intranet weblog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But things do not just stop there. Several other weblogging tools, like, for instance, Qumana do have the possibility of using different APIs to connect to weblogging engines. So that is why although Roller may not be listed there I can still create an account using the MetaWeblog API, which seems to be working just fine. I can connect to my Intranet weblog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elsua.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New version of Qumana Available</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>elsua.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New version of Qumana Available</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsr.blogsome.com/2005/08/15/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] However, what I really like about the latest release from Qumana&#160;is the fact that it continues to evolve providing advanced webloggers with the possibility of inserting their own HTML tags to customise posts the way they would want. This very handy feature, along with the growing list of keyboard shortcuts, makes it even faster working with and sharing your content in your own weblog. So if anybody would ask me for a weblogging software tool to work with I would be more than happy to recommend Qumana. why ? Because it delivers pretty well what it promises. As simple as that. And not many offerings and show that off. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, what I really like about the latest release from Qumana&nbsp;is the fact that it continues to evolve providing advanced webloggers with the possibility of inserting their own HTML tags to customise posts the way they would want. This very handy feature, along with the growing list of keyboard shortcuts, makes it even faster working with and sharing your content in your own weblog. So if anybody would ask me for a weblogging software tool to work with I would be more than happy to recommend Qumana. why ? Because it delivers pretty well what it promises. As simple as that. And not many offerings and show that off. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elsua.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Payoffs of Listening to Your End-Users</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>elsua.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Payoffs of Listening to Your End-Users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsr.blogsome.com/2005/08/15/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] You probably have read already how about a few weeks ago I created a weblog post introducing one of my favourite weblogging tools, next to w.bloggar: Qumana. I am sure that if you have read that weblog post you also read about the comparison I made between Qumana and w.bloggar. Back when I created that weblog post I mentioned that there would be a couple of items for which w.bloggar would still be my default weblogging tool, as opposed to Qumana: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You probably have read already how about a few weeks ago I created a weblog post introducing one of my favourite weblogging tools, next to w.bloggar: Qumana. I am sure that if you have read that weblog post you also read about the comparison I made between Qumana and w.bloggar. Back when I created that weblog post I mentioned that there would be a couple of items for which w.bloggar would still be my default weblogging tool, as opposed to Qumana: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elsua.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Qumana vs. w.bloggar Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>elsua.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Qumana vs. w.bloggar Comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsr.blogsome.com/2005/08/15/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] A couple of days ago I wrote an extensive weblog entry on a relatively new weblogging tool that came out some time ago and that people who may be getting started with their own weblog would find it very interesting if they would want to publish content to their weblog with hardly any effort. That tool is Qumana and I thought that after a couple of days trying it out I would share a couple of comments about it and try to make a comparison between Qumana and w.bloggar. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A couple of days ago I wrote an extensive weblog entry on a relatively new weblogging tool that came out some time ago and that people who may be getting started with their own weblog would find it very interesting if they would want to publish content to their weblog with hardly any effort. That tool is Qumana and I thought that after a couple of days trying it out I would share a couple of comments about it and try to make a comparison between Qumana and w.bloggar. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

